Six Cores Is Better Than Four
I recall the days of single core to dual-core transition. I hopped onto the bandwagon rather early because I saw and experienced the benefits first hand through the multi-threaded nature Hyper Threaded Pentium 4’s.
Dual-core is awesome and benefitial, but what about quad-core? Great for encoding, but overkill for a desktop. Most single applications have yet to fully utilize dual-cores. Even if you are running multiple CPU intensive tasks, dual-cores should suffice. That is, unless you insist on encoding 2 movies at the same time while playing World of Warcraft.
So why is Intel bringing a six core processor in the second half of 2008? For servers and those who multitask with the power of 3 persons of course. Just because we don’t need six cores, doesn’t mean Intel should stop pushing the boundaries.
Tags: cpu, intel
Email To A Friend
- Intel Nehalem Preview - June 5, 2008
- Intel Core i7 Is Here! - November 3, 2008
- Intel’s Larrabee - The Future GPU and CPU - August 4, 2008
- 140W CPUs, 8W Dual-core CPUs and NVIDIA CPUs?! - May 26, 2008
- Is It Possible? - Intel Inside Consoles - February 11, 2008





